Thursday, 12 November 2015

key points, quotes and 250 word summary of text


I chose the text “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” by Walter Benjamin (1936)

Key points and Quotes:


The author’s tone of voice implies he is against reproduction because he says how it destroys the aurora of artworks.

“Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be.”

“Guided by the cameraman, the camera continually changes its position with respect to the performance. The sequence of positional views which the editor composes from the material supplied him constitutes the completed film.”

“Also, the film actor lacks the opportunity of the stage actor to adjust to the audience during his performance, since he does not present his performance to the audience in person.”

“However, the singularity of the shot in the studio is that the camera is substituted for the public. Consequently, the aura that envelops the actor vanishes, and with it the aura of the figure he portrays.”

“In contrast, the distracted mass absorbs the work of art. This is most obvious with regard to buildings.”

When people concentrate on a piece of art they are connecting with it but when masses pass a piece of art they do not see it as a piece of art.

Coins are one of the earliest pieces of artwork that were mass reproduced

With film the actor is disconnected from the audience instead the camera is a replacement for the audience

The invention of film is also a threat to traditional and cultural values as like with photography replacing the painting, film replaces the theatre.

Art used to be based on ritual in which the piece of artwork would be ritualistic and have an aura about it whereas in the modern day due to the rise of reproduction the purpose of art is no longer ritualistic but political. 


250 word summary of the text:


I think what Walter Benjamin is trying to say in this piece of text is that the purpose and the audience of art has changed a great deal due to the process of reproduction. A case of this would be the fact that art used to be based on ritual in which the piece of artwork would be ritualistic and have an aura about it whereas in the modern day due to the rise of reproduction the purpose of art is no longer ritualistic but political. The reason for this is mainly due to the invention of photography with in turn implies the rise of reproduction. The effect of reproduction on art is not only limited to paintings but to other art forms such as theatrical plays. The invention of film is also a threat to traditional and cultural values as like with photography replacing the painting, film replaces the theatre. Benjamin also says how art is now ignored most of the time, as people don’t view it as art, they are not connecting with it. “In contrast, the distracted mass absorbs the work of art. This is most obvious with regard to buildings”.   The author’s tone of voice implies he is against reproduction because he says how it destroys the aurora of artworks, “Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be.”

Thursday, 15 October 2015

Animation Analysis


i have chosen to compare "A Short Vision" and "Duck Amuck". These two animations are very different, for example "Duck Amuck" is very deconstructive because some of the backgrounds are not drawn out before the character steps into them, this is used in a comical way to add appeal. Whereas "A Short Vision" is not deconstructive as it is quite a serious film whilst not appearing so at first.

"A Short Vision" is quite primal as it shows the fear of death and the horror of mass extinction. in the film it says how the scholars looked up and died and then said exactly the same for the rest of the people, this shows that in death no one is better than anyone in terms of human classes or in terms of animals and humans as the humans died in the same way the animals did. "Duck Amuck" is not primal because although it may have some hidden contexts it doesn't touch on the extreme factors of our animalistic qualities and the urges/emotions that we can have.

"A Short Story" seems as though it is aimed at kids because of the narrators smooth voiceover and the slow opening panning shots and even the title suggests that it's an animation aimed at children but the story is quite sinister and horrifying for a child. "Duck Amuck" seems to be aimed at everyone as it is funny and appealing and although in modern times people may think animation is mostly for children as most modern animated films are primarily aimed at children, in the 1950's when this film was made people thought animation was interesting as a medium and captured all audiences.

Although both films are very different they are similar in the fact that they both break the paradigm that is set for them. For example "A Short Story" is like many other children's short stories in the way it is animated, the sound and the soothing qualities of the voiceover but then it breaks that paradigm by emerging in a dark story about all of humanity and wildlife being eradicated. "Duck Amuck" also does something similar by starting like a normal carton so the viewer thinks they are just going to watch another cartoon following the normal formula for animated films but instead they are presented with a very different, creative approach to a animated cartoon by having Daffy complain about how the sets arn't yet set out for him.